Because the official account official has adjusted the push rules, if you want to continue to receive the contents of the official account, please set the public building number of the building as the star sign, and more points of the “look at” and “praise” in the end of the article
. 
“If you want to continue to receive the official account, please note that the” WeChat “is a public key
. 
Star setting: enter the official account homepage, click the “top” corner, click “set star”, and the official account will appear yellow Pentagram (Android and iOS user operation alike)
. 
“Today, with the continuous improvement of design requirements and design standards, there are some unreasonable charging methods in China’s construction engineering design, which is not conducive to the healthy and sustainable development of the construction engineering industry
. 
Therefore, it is necessary to formulate and issue a new version of the charging standard for architectural engineering design
.
” During the two sessions of this year, Feng Yuan, member of the National Committee of the Chinese people’s Political Consultative Conference and chief engineer of China Southwest Architectural Design and Research Institute Co., Ltd., together with Wang Cuikun, member of the National Committee of the Chinese people’s Political Consultative Conference, deputy chief engineer of China Academy of Architectural Sciences and chairman of Jianyan science and Technology Co., Ltd., brought suggestions on the formulation and promulgation of new charging standards for architectural engineering design as soon as possible
.
Feng Yuan, member of the National Committee of the Chinese people’s Political Consultative Conference and chief engineer of China Southwest Architectural Design and Research Institute Co., Ltd., believes that architectural design is an act of creating value through innovation and creativity, and the carrier of value is “service”, and its charging standard should be formulated by the State price department
.
Since the founding of the people’s Republic of China, design fees have experienced the transition from national pricing to national guidance price, until now it is completely determined by the market
.
In 2002, the State price Department promulgated the “engineering design fee standard” (hereinafter referred to as “02 standard”)
.
In 2015, the national development and Reform Commission canceled the 02 standard, leaving the charging standard to the market
.
For a long time, design fees are generally not high, which has affected the design progress and healthy development of the construction industry
.
Specifically, the current architectural design fee problems are as follows: the design fee standard does not follow the development of the national economy
.
From 2002 to now, China’s urbanization level has increased rapidly, and its national strength has increased significantly
.
Its GDP has increased from 12.2 trillion in 2002 to 101.6 trillion in 2020, with a huge increase
.
CPI, inflation are also rising, labor costs and raw material prices are also rising
.
On the other hand, although the 02 standard has been abolished, it is still used as the reference basis for most of the engineering design fees, especially the only auditing basis for state-owned investment projects
.
As a result, the design fees have not increased in the past 20 years, which is seriously out of line with the rapid development of the national economy
.
The design content and the charge are asymmetric
.
In the past 20 years, new policies and regulations on architectural design have been introduced and upgraded, design content has been increasing, design work has been extended forward and backward, and preliminary planning and even later operation consultation have been included
.
Due to the lack of national charging standards, there is no charging basis for new contents such as BIM, industrialization, sponge city and green building, as well as various special design works such as seismic overrun and fire protection, resulting in a large number of design contents completed to improve high-quality design results can not be charged accordingly
.
The design responsibility is not equal to the charge
.
The design responsibility is undertaken by the undertaking enterprises and practicing individuals, and this responsibility is lifelong
.
Especially under the architect responsibility system, the design responsibility and non-traditional drawing work increase greatly, resulting in a serious mismatch between responsibility and right, the charging standard can not support the service, and the remuneration does not reflect the growth corresponding to the service
.
Feng Yuan believes that at this stage, the unclear design fee standard, low price and incomplete coverage are easy to cause the following problems: the decline of design quality
.
Under the pressure of low “market price”, architectural design can only get profit through quantity
.
More design quantity, less design time and low market rate are easy to leave inferior products to the society
.
What’s more, in order to make profits, there are situations where people do not hesitate to play the standard edge ball and try to touch the safety bottom line, which is easy to leave hidden dangers and even lead to major accidents
.
Weaken the overall competitiveness
.
The constant or even declining architectural design fees have obviously caused the return of architectural design talents to lag behind other sectors of the industry
.
It is more difficult for design enterprises to recruit outstanding fresh students in Colleges and universities
.
The designers are tired and the brain drain is serious
.
Enterprises can not see the positive results brought by research technology and invention and innovation, and it is difficult to invest more funds in R & D, and In the long run, the quality and technical accumulation of the whole architectural design talent team will be difficult to maintain or even decline, and the international competitiveness will be difficult to improve
.
It will lead to vicious competition
.
Architectural design results are different from general commodities, and the degree of customization is very high, especially for public buildings
.
Almost every project is the result of customization, which has a strong attribute of public goods
.
In the case of unclear charging standards and asymmetric information, it is easy to win the bid at a low price and damage the overall interests of the industry
.
In order to fully guarantee the fair and orderly competition environment in the construction engineering design market, cultivate high-quality design talents, enhance the competitive strength of Chinese design enterprises, and provide a solid guarantee for the healthy and sustainable development of China’s architectural design industry, Feng Yuan specifically suggests that a new version of architectural engineering design fee standard be formulated and issued as soon as possible
.
Architectural design is a knowledge intensive service industry, which needs a price standard that meets the development level of the industry and the requirements of the times
.
However, at this stage, architectural design fees mostly refer to 02 standard, which is the standard 20 years ago, and the rates and contents need to be improved
.
Therefore, we should re formulate the fee standard as soon as possible, and form a regular revision mechanism, so as to protect and promote architectural design The healthy development of accounting industry
.
Carry out the research of construction engineering service content and rate standard
.
Clear the business classification of construction engineering services, refine the scope, and formulate the rate standard accordingly
.
Firstly, it is necessary to define the charging standard for the planning, feasibility study, environmental impact assessment, site selection, planning, design, special consultation, supervision, operation, management and other links of the project, as well as the management coordination covering the cross stage; secondly, it is necessary to refine the design contents, including BIM, industrialization, sponge City, green building, seismic overrun, fire protection and other new design contents in recent years The third is to consider the type and complexity of the design project, such as building height, span, seismic intensity, new technology application and other elements, so as to effectively reflect the value of the design work
.
Note: part of the content of this article comes from China Construction News Network and is released with the authorization of master Feng Yuan
.
Some of the pictures in this article are from the Internet, and the copyright belongs to the original author and the original source
.
If it involves infringement or the owner of the original right does not agree
.
