Jianjiantong media ID: jianzhong001 do you still remember the accident: on March 4, the Management Committee of Hengqin new area of Zhuhai City officially released the investigation report on the general accident of “1.3” falling of 3 pier of Honghe bridge in Zhuhai City
. 
Accident process: at about 15:00 on January 3, 2021, Tan of Jiangmen Zexing company, together with team members Chen Xingxing, Zhang Chuntao and Zhang Chunhua, went to the bridge deck of 3 pier of Honghe bridge through the safety ladder from the ground, and then went down to the lower beam platform of the pier through the ladder to prepare for the installation of the drainage pipe at the bottom of the bridge (the height of the lower beam surface from the bottom of the cement bearing platform is 29.8m)
. 
Tan, Chen Xingxing and Zhang Chuntao collected construction materials on the lower beam platform of the pier to improve the edge protection facilities; Zhang Chunhua entered the bridge maintenance vehicle from the boarding platform on the southwest side of the lower beam platform to collect materials
.
In order to facilitate the next step of construction, Tan led the other three people to use the steel pipe, steel wire protective net, iron wire, iron scaffold and other materials collected on the lower beam platform to set up a temporary simple passage between the lower beam platform near the North Tower and the bridge inspection car
.
At about 16:00, Qian Yuanjing, the safety officer of Wuhan Shipbuilding Heavy Industry Co., Ltd., found this temporary simple passage (which has been built) when he inspected the platform under the crossbeam of 3 pier
.
He verbally stopped the four people from continuing to build it on the spot, and issued a notice on rectification of potential safety hazards, requiring Tan and others to dismantle the passage before January 4
.
At about 17:15, Tan, Chen Xingxing and Zhang Chuntao took off their seat belts and prepared to get off the bridge for work
.
Tan (only wearing safety helmet) said “take things” and turned back to the temporary simple passage on the lower beam bridge deck
.
When walking on the passage, the passage suddenly disintegrated and damaged
.
In a hurry, Tan grasped the steel wire protective net with both hands and hung up in the lower part of the passage
.
Tan struggled to climb up
.
Seeing the scene, Zhang Chunhua, a worker on the bridge inspection car, threw a rope to tan to rescue him
.
He tried twice, but it was not effective
.
At about 17:16, due to lack of strength, Tan fell on the concrete bearing platform at the bottom of pier 3
.
We sort out the whole process a little bit: at 15:00, several operators were ready to take this channel; the safety officer checked and found it at 16:00 and asked to stop, and also issued a rectification notice; at about 17:15, an accident occurred! The handling opinions of the safety officer in the accident report: the safety officer did not seriously perform the responsibility of work safety
.
Although the temporary simple passage set up by Tan and others was found in the inspection, the safety officer did not supervise its removal on site, and did not report the situation in time, so he was responsible for the accident, It is suggested that the municipal transportation department should deal with it according to Article 93 of the work safety law of the people’s Republic of China
.
The safety officer found that it was not timely, and verbally asked for immediate demolition, so the accident report confirmed that the safety officer found the behavior of setting up the channel in the inspection, but the problem was that there was no on-site supervision for its demolition! So be responsible for the accident, even if you have issued a rectification order! When I drive illegally, the traffic police find that they have stopped me and punished me, but if I continue to violate the rules, will the traffic police be responsible for the accident? I found potential safety hazards, but as a safety officer, I didn’t have the authority to transfer the production factors of people, materials and machines, so I could only issue a rectification notice
.
In the rectification period, if there is an accident, do I have to bear the responsibility? Is the safety officer in charge of safety or supervising safety? For hidden dangers, should safety officers find and solve them by themselves, or should they find hidden dangers, require rectification, and finally accept the rectification? Finally, an article long ago is attached: security officers are not in charge of safety?! It may completely overturn the concept of many people, “safety officer is in charge of safety!” The two views collide again
.
To this end, the author had to think about this problem again, a good idea, answer the netizens why “a lot of security officers are in charge of security” this question
.
To answer this question, we can’t understand this sentence one sidedly, so once again, the complete statement of this sentence is: the safety officer is not in charge of safety, but a safety production supervisor
.
Some people say that it’s not the same thing
.
Safety supervision is to manage safety
.
Yes, it seems to be the same thing
.
In fact, there is a big difference
.
It is the fuzzy concept of safety management and safety supervision that leads to a long-term misunderstanding in the management of safety production, that the safety officer is in charge of safety, and that the important responsibility of safety officer is to supervise safety production is blurred, even forgotten or deprived
.
If someone says that the supervision of production safety is the management of safety, can we put this sentence on the staff of the relevant government supervision departments of production safety and say that they are the management personnel of production safety instead of the supervision personnel of production safety? They certainly won’t accept it
.
Some people say that enterprise safety officers are not the same as the staff of relevant government safety supervision departments
.
It’s true that enterprise safety officers are really different from the staff of relevant government work safety supervision departments
.
The staff of relevant government work safety supervision departments supervise and manage work safety on behalf of the government, while enterprise safety officers supervise and manage work safety on behalf of enterprises
.
However, there is little difference in their work contents
.
Therefore, the enterprise safety officer is actually a safety production supervision and management personnel appointed by the enterprise
.
In a more strict sense, the enterprise safety officer is the enterprise safety production supervision personnel with corresponding responsibilities given by the laws and regulations of safety production
.
Next, from the perspective of production safety laws and regulations to demonstrate the correctness of the sentence “safety officer is not in charge of safety”
.
First of all, let’s look at the opinions of the CPC Central Committee and the State Council on promoting the reform and development of work safety
.
The opinions of the CPC Central Committee and the State Council on promoting the reform and development in the field of production safety point out that we must adhere to the principles of managing industry must manage safety, managing business must manage safety, managing production and operation must manage safety and who is in charge is responsible
.
This is consistent with the principle of safety production management for a long time
.
Who is responsible for the production and operation activities of the enterprise, who should be the main person in charge of safety
.
Obviously, the legal representative of the enterprise, the actual controller of the enterprise’s production activities, the main technical person in charge of the enterprise, and the responsible person and person in charge of each link of the enterprise’s production management activities, including the project manager, construction workers and each production team leader on the construction site, are all the actual managers of the relevant safety production
.
They should manage the production and operation activities and the safety at the same time
.
For example, the opinions of the CPC Central Committee and the State Council on promoting the reform and development of work safety clearly stipulates that “the legal representative and the actual controller are both the first person responsible for work safety, and the main technical person in charge is responsible for the decision-making and command of work safety technology, strengthening the Department’s work safety responsibilities, and implementing one post and two responsibilities”
.
Is the safety officer in charge of production? Safety officers don’t care about production
.
Because the safety officer does not care about production, so the safety officer does not have the actual responsibility or main responsibility for safety management in production activities, but the supervision responsibility
.
The safety officer should be a supervisor of safety production
.
Therefore, theoretically or in terms of management norms, the main responsibility of safety production management should not be borne by the safety officer, but by the legal representative of the enterprise, the actual controller of the enterprise’s production activities, the main technical person in charge of the enterprise, and the person in charge of all production management activities of the enterprise, including the project manager, constructors and each production team on the construction site Long wait for personnel to undertake.
.
